Littlest Pet Shop Book Covering

below, to press for a discussion, an excerpt from Article Rossana Rossanda on Manifetso on the proposals contained in the manifesto on women's work of the Library of the women of Milan, in particular the fact CEH women should reduce the work to devote to their children

Mothers flexible

write now Lia and women of Via Dogana, but it is a disgrace? We would not be more happy if we only wish that we did drive by the ideologies of the past, we have close to full-time permanent job, shrinking our need to be with their children? On the other hand it suggests a desire to be mothers, but also access to the wealth of reports that domestic work decreases. Labour is hard work but also social and sometimes even satisfaction. Not only exploitation. So we say yes twice, motherhood and work.

But to be livable, 'double yes' may not lead to sixteen hours of work per day, eight paid in company, two are in transport and unpaid family: fatigue crack. We look benevolent eye to the part-time, flexible and non-standard contract that the company gives us more easily. Reduce work time outside, we four plus two plus four or flessibilizziamolo, not by calculating a time (which we find in the crevices) but a result. Well mom and companies can meet the company likes to have a worker, as was said once the car, just in time, and the mother needs to be more free. So the work is feminized, adds a few enthusiastic friends: women are more and more, for less time, more flexible, they are not fixed in the struggle class, the rigidity of the rules and rights, use of a full pension for life and the next. In their time, quick and articulate, they bring their very traditional quality, precision, attention, fluency, lack of conflict.

pretty picture, but not convincing. Are the times and accounts that do not add up. To successfully achieve the double yes you would have two conditions, that the public service would guarantee a professional structure semigratuita to look after the house and children while she works, and that the company would pay the worker at least as a man, having to provide a small creature. If there are these two conditions, as was in some Scandinavian countries, the medium is not enough time to live, much less pay for the other woman to be entrusted with the house and children.

The lure of the welfare state

The two conditions in Italy are not there. Except in some cities, the public service does not exist or is at its lowest, and that the EU does not seek to reduce public spending until 2013. Salaries (not to mention the lack of jobs in times of crisis) tend to degrade the precarious, forcing you to think that the month in which you will be suspended, it certainly invites you to plan a pregnancy. Paradoxically, the proposal would mean that the Library communist society in total and targeted redistribution, which was thrown to the winds as a mirage in here for thirty years. And we have not even whispered to us, I think, was less than the market?

In the market, and more deregulated, and home care for a child to be paid, unless you put it free on the lap of some aunt or grandmother, the free eternizzando of women's work nursing that only someone who has never done everything it can feel joy and pleasure. In the market, with the little money we have, we will pay the caregiver (such as name Bossi) as little as possible; and there is no limit to the race at the bottom of the payment in time of shortage, so we put one knee on the neck of the migrants. We're both wrong because the European statistics confirm that women are paid (if all goes well as in France) on 20 per cent less than men. In regular employment.